Add more JsonRawValue encode/decode impls.#3859
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Box<JsonRawValue> types.This allows keeping structs that implement FromRow lifetime-free,
previously you had to use `&'a JsonRawValue`.
```rust
struct Foo {
bar: Box<JsonRawValue>,
}
```
ba6f4d4 to
aab820b
Compare
Contributor
Author
|
rebased |
willothy
pushed a commit
to freestyle-sh/sqlx
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2025
* Add support for `Box<JsonRawValue>` types.
This allows keeping structs that implement FromRow lifetime-free,
previously you had to use `&'a JsonRawValue`.
```rust
struct Foo {
bar: Box<JsonRawValue>,
}
```
* Add Encode impls for `JsonRawValue`.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR adds a
Decodeimpl forBox<JsonRawValue>. This allows keeping structs that implement FromRow lifetime-free,previously you had to use
&'a JsonRawValue.I've also added
Encodeimpls forJsonRawValue. There was a comment stating "We don't have to implement Encode for JsonRawValue because that's covered by the default implementation for Encode" but as far as I can tell that's not true, no default impl would coverJsonRawValue.