Skip to content

OrdinaryDiffEq updates#276

Open
benegee wants to merge 13 commits intomainfrom
bg/fix-retcode-check
Open

OrdinaryDiffEq updates#276
benegee wants to merge 13 commits intomainfrom
bg/fix-retcode-check

Conversation

@benegee
Copy link
Collaborator

@benegee benegee commented Feb 11, 2026

This PR originates from: https://github.com/trixi-framework/libtrixi/actions/runs/21808243190/job/62915273766#step:19:211

According to the docs (https://docs.sciml.ai/SciMLBase/stable/interfaces/Solutions/#SciMLBase.ReturnCode) the return code has be checked for success differently, and this is what I did.

I am not sure which version actually introduced the change which made the old check fail, nor do I know which version introduced support for the new check.
Instead, I decided to move to the split OrdinaryDiffEq packages, which I wanted to do at some point anyway.

Doing so, I realized we actually do not need OrdinaryDiffEq in LibTrixi.jl itself (just like with Trixi.jl).

Remaining questions @sloede

  1. Was there a reason to include OrdinaryDiffEq in LibTrixi.jl, which I do not remember?
  2. Are the precompilation setting
    [preferences.OrdinaryDiffEq]
    obsolete when using OrdinaryDiffEqLowStorageRK only?

CompatHelper Julia and others added 13 commits January 20, 2026 00:20
Bumps [crate-ci/typos](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos) from 1.42.1 to 1.43.3.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/crate-ci/typos/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](crate-ci/typos@v1.42.1...v1.43.3)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: crate-ci/typos
  dependency-version: 1.43.3
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-minor
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
…-08-00-28-43-503-03382000766' into bg/fix-retcode-check
…-08-00-29-24-487-00230620603' into bg/fix-retcode-check
…-20-00-20-01-226-02439714846' into bg/fix-retcode-check
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 11, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 96.11%. Comparing base (3ed99f5) to head (cc92816).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #276   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.11%   96.11%           
=======================================
  Files          25       25           
  Lines        1260     1260           
  Branches       74       74           
=======================================
  Hits         1211     1211           
  Misses         45       45           
  Partials        4        4           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 96.11% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@benegee benegee changed the title Use recommended checking of return codes OrdinaryDiffEq updates Feb 12, 2026
@benegee benegee requested a review from sloede February 12, 2026 09:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant