refactor(frontend): move JS payload encoders out of PlayerBridge into PlayerPayloads

[twangodev]

Extract the hand-rolled JS/JSON encoders (escapeJs, jsonString, mediaInfoJson, spectrogramJson) into an internal PlayerPayloads object so PlayerBridge stays a pure JCEF bridge and PlayerHtmlLoader no longer depends on the bridge type.

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@twangodev, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: bc6518f0-cff1-470a-be12-d452d8c0c45e

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3d3a088 and 5d799af.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)

• frontend/src/main/kotlin/dev/twango/jetplay/browser/PlayerBridge.kt
• frontend/src/main/kotlin/dev/twango/jetplay/browser/PlayerHtmlLoader.kt
• frontend/src/main/kotlin/dev/twango/jetplay/browser/PlayerPayloads.kt
• frontend/src/test/kotlin/dev/twango/jetplay/browser/PlayerBridgeEscapeTest.kt

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch refactor/extract-player-payloads

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[github-actions]

Qodana for JVM

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked

View the detailed Qodana report

To be able to view the detailed Qodana report, you can either:

• Register at Qodana Cloud and configure the action
• Use GitHub Code Scanning with Qodana
• Host Qodana report at GitHub Pages
• Inspect and use qodana.sarif.json (see the Qodana SARIF format for details)

To get *.log files or any other Qodana artifacts, run the action with upload-result option set to true,
so that the action will upload the files as the job artifacts:

      - name: 'Qodana Scan'
        uses: JetBrains/qodana-action@v2026.1.3
        with:
          upload-result: true

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

[Copilot]

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has reached their quota limit.