Skip to content

fix: correct GitHub Pages directory structure and preserve PR #169 content#187

Merged
uelkerd merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
feat/demo-website-minimal
Sep 26, 2025
Merged

fix: correct GitHub Pages directory structure and preserve PR #169 content#187
uelkerd merged 8 commits into
mainfrom
feat/demo-website-minimal

Conversation

@uelkerd
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

@uelkerd uelkerd commented Sep 26, 2025

Summary

Key Changes

Directory Structure Correction

  • Move comprehensive-demo.html from docs/site/website/
  • Move CSS styles from docs/site/css/website/css/
  • Remove incorrect simplified index.html (preserve enterprise version)

Content Preservation

Fortress Compliance

  • 3 files changed (≤5 fortress limit)
  • All fortress guard validations passed
  • Clean git history with proper file moves

Directory Structure Impact

Before (Incorrect):

docs/site/           # ❌ Wrong directory for GitHub Pages
├── index.html
├── comprehensive-demo.html
└── css/styles.css

After (Correct):

website/             # ✅ Correct directory for GitHub Pages  
├── index.html       # Enterprise version from PR #169
├── comprehensive-demo.html  # Moved from docs/site/
├── demo.html        # Existing from PR #169
├── integration.html # Existing from PR #169  
└── css/styles.css   # Moved from docs/site/

GitHub Pages Configuration

  • Workflow already configured for website/ directory ✅
  • Trigger paths include website/**
  • Deployment pipeline uses correct source ✅

References

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Co-Authored-By: Claude noreply@anthropic.com

Summary by Sourcery

Correct the GitHub Pages directory structure by moving demo assets and styles to the website directory, preserve existing enterprise content from PR #169, and introduce a full-featured interactive demo with updated UI styling.

New Features:

  • Add a full-featured interactive demo in the website directory

Bug Fixes:

  • Relocate demo HTML files and CSS from docs/site to website and remove obsolete docs/site files for proper GitHub Pages source

Enhancements:

  • Introduce shared CSS styles with modern gradients, glassmorphism effects, animations, and responsive improvements

Documentation:

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation

    • Removed legacy static site pages and public demo/integration guides, including their embedded interactive demos and sample content.
  • Style

    • Introduced a consolidated external dark theme stylesheet and added a demo-specific stylesheet for glassy cards, progress visuals, and loading states.
  • Chores

    • Replaced extensive inline styles with external CSS and updated site navigation targets and demo links.

uelkerd and others added 2 commits September 26, 2025 21:21
- Delete docs/site/demo.html and docs/site/integration.html (unnecessary complexity)
- Minimize docs/site/index.html content (remove hype, simplify to 3 features)
- Add docs/site/css/styles.css (shared design system with glassmorphism)
- Maintain comprehensive-demo.html as full-featured option

Fortress-compliant: 4 files changed (≤5 limit)

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Move comprehensive-demo.html from docs/site/ to website/
- Move CSS styles from docs/site/css/ to website/css/
- Remove incorrect simplified index.html (preserve enterprise version from PR #169)
- GitHub Pages workflow already configured for website/ directory

Resolves directory structure issue identified in PR review.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings September 26, 2025 19:40
@sourcery-ai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

sourcery-ai Bot commented Sep 26, 2025

Reviewer's Guide

This PR realigns GitHub Pages to the correct website/ directory by moving demo, integration, and index files out of docs/site, introduces a new comprehensive CSS stylesheet under website/css, and preserves the enterprise-grade content from PR #169 including the full-featured index, demo, and integration pages.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Correct directory structure and introduce website styling
  • Relocated demo, integration, and index pages from docs/site to website
  • Removed outdated docs/site files (demo.html, index.html, integration.html)
  • Added advanced CSS file under website/css with theme variables, glassmorphism, animations, and responsive rules
docs/site/demo.html
docs/site/index.html
docs/site/integration.html
website/css/styles.css
Preserve enterprise-grade content from PR #169
  • Retained website/index.html with full 6-feature showcase, performance metrics, and Production Emotion Detection API branding
  • Maintained existing demo.html and integration.html examples
website/index.html
website/demo.html
website/integration.html

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it. You can also reply to a
    review comment with @sourcery-ai issue to create an issue from it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time. You can also comment
    @sourcery-ai title on the pull request to (re-)generate the title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time exactly where you
    want it. You can also comment @sourcery-ai summary on the pull request to
    (re-)generate the summary at any time.
  • Generate reviewer's guide: Comment @sourcery-ai guide on the pull
    request to (re-)generate the reviewer's guide at any time.
  • Resolve all Sourcery comments: Comment @sourcery-ai resolve on the
    pull request to resolve all Sourcery comments. Useful if you've already
    addressed all the comments and don't want to see them anymore.
  • Dismiss all Sourcery reviews: Comment @sourcery-ai dismiss on the pull
    request to dismiss all existing Sourcery reviews. Especially useful if you
    want to start fresh with a new review - don't forget to comment
    @sourcery-ai review to trigger a new review!

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented Sep 26, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

Removes several static docs/site and website demo/integration pages, centralizes styling into new external CSS files (css/styles.css and css/demo.css), updates website HTML to reference the external styles, and eliminates multiple client-side demo pages and their embedded scripts and assets.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary of Changes
Docs site removals
docs/site/demo.html, docs/site/index.html, docs/site/integration.html
Deleted entire static docs site pages including UI, demos, integration guides, client-side demo scripts, sample data, and embedded assets.
New central stylesheet
website/css/styles.css
Added a comprehensive dark-theme design system with variables, typography, components (nav, hero, cards), buttons, code blocks, animations, utilities, and responsive rules.
Demo-specific stylesheet
website/css/demo.css
Added glassy/demo UI styles: .demo-container, .emotion-card, .confidence-bar, loading spinner, float animation, gradient text, visibility toggles, and mobile adjustments.
Website HTML updates
website/index.html, website/comprehensive-demo.html
Replaced large inline CSS blocks with external stylesheet references; updated navigation targets and minor content/text tweaks; removed a couple of inline nav links.
Website demo/integration removals
website/demo.html, website/integration.html
Deleted full client-side demo and integration guide pages (HTML, inline scripts, charts, sample texts, and demo logic).

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant Browser as Demo UI (browser)
    participant API as Emotion API / Mock
    participant ChartMgr as ChartManager

    User->>Browser: submit text / click analyze
    Browser->>Browser: show loading state
    Browser->>API: request analysis (real API or simulation)
    alt API success
        API-->>Browser: emotion results
    else API failure / missing
        API-->>Browser: error -> Browser uses simulated results
    end
    Browser->>ChartMgr: destroy existing charts (safe/no-op)
    ChartMgr-->>Browser: destroy confirmed
    Browser->>ChartMgr: create/update charts (bar/doughnut)
    ChartMgr-->>Browser: charts rendered
    Browser->>User: display results, API info, hide loading
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • sourcery-ai

Poem

Thump-thump I hopped on keys tonight,
Old pages folded gently out of sight.
New styles bloom where code once lay,
Charts hum softly, demos sway.
Hooray — I nibble carrots, sing away. 🐰✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The provided title succinctly describes the main purpose of the pull request—it corrects the GitHub Pages directory structure while preserving the enterprise content introduced in PR #169—which directly aligns with the changeset without extraneous detail.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/demo-website-minimal

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @uelkerd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the project's web content by correcting the GitHub Pages directory structure. It ensures that all demo and styling assets are correctly located within the website/ directory, while meticulously preserving the rich, enterprise-grade content and interactive demo introduced in a previous pull request. The changes streamline the deployment process for GitHub Pages and maintain the integrity of the existing web presence.

Highlights

  • Directory Structure Correction: Demo and styling files have been moved from the incorrect docs/site/ directory to the proper website/ directory, aligning with GitHub Pages requirements.
  • Content Preservation: The comprehensive, enterprise-grade content from PR feat: Add comprehensive demo website with DeBERTa v3 Large integration #169, including the website/index.html and its branding, feature showcase, and integration examples, has been fully preserved.
  • Comprehensive Demo Integration: The full-featured interactive demo (comprehensive-demo.html) has been relocated to the correct website/ directory, ensuring its proper functionality and accessibility.
  • CSS Consolidation: CSS styles previously located in docs/site/css/ have been moved and consolidated into a new website/css/styles.css file.
  • Redundant File Removal: The incorrect simplified index.html, demo.html, and integration.html files from the docs/site/ directory have been removed.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@deepsource-io
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

deepsource-io Bot commented Sep 26, 2025

Here's the code health analysis summary for commits 81bca47..134f65a. View details on DeepSource ↗.

Analysis Summary

AnalyzerStatusSummaryLink
DeepSource Test coverage LogoTest coverage⚠️ Artifact not reportedTimed out: Artifact was never reportedView Check ↗
DeepSource Python LogoPython✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Terraform LogoTerraform✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Secrets LogoSecrets✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Shell LogoShell✅ SuccessView Check ↗
DeepSource Docker LogoDocker✅ SuccessView Check ↗

💡 If you’re a repository administrator, you can configure the quality gates from the settings.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey there - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

  • Update all page links and navigation references to point to the new website/ paths to prevent broken links after the move.
  • Consider splitting the large styles.css into modular files or removing unused CSS variables to improve maintainability and reduce payload.
  • Verify that the interactive demo and integration pages are correctly included in the site build and that assets load properly from website/css/.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:

## Overall Comments
- Update all page links and navigation references to point to the new website/ paths to prevent broken links after the move.
- Consider splitting the large styles.css into modular files or removing unused CSS variables to improve maintainability and reduce payload.
- Verify that the interactive demo and integration pages are correctly included in the site build and that assets load properly from website/css/.

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR corrects the GitHub Pages directory structure by moving demo files from the incorrect docs/site/ directory to the proper website/ directory, while preserving comprehensive content from PR #169.

  • Move CSS and demo files to correct GitHub Pages directory
  • Remove incorrectly placed files from docs/site/
  • Preserve enterprise-grade content and branding

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 5 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

File Description
website/css/styles.css Moves shared CSS from docs/site/ to correct website/ directory
docs/site/integration.html Removes incorrectly placed integration guide
docs/site/index.html Removes incorrectly placed enterprise homepage
docs/site/demo.html Removes incorrectly placed demo page

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Comment thread website/css/styles.css Outdated
Comment thread website/css/styles.css Outdated
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly moves the website files from the docs/site/ directory to the correct website/ directory for GitHub Pages deployment. This is a good structural improvement. My main feedback is regarding the new website/css/styles.css file. While creating a shared stylesheet is an excellent step towards better code organization, the file is currently not linked in any of the HTML pages, making it unused. I've added a comment with suggestions to complete this refactoring.

Comment thread website/css/styles.css
@@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
/* Shared styles for SAMO-DL website */
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

high

This new stylesheet is a great step towards centralizing styles for the website. However, it's currently not linked in any of the HTML files within the website/ directory (index.html, comprehensive-demo.html, etc.), which means these styles are not being applied and the file is effectively unused.

To complete this refactoring, you should:

  1. Link this stylesheet in the <head> of the relevant HTML files (e.g., <link rel="stylesheet" href="css/styles.css">).
  2. Refactor the inline <style> blocks in the HTML files to remove duplicated styles that are now defined here.
  3. Ensure the styles in this shared file are consistent with the intended design across all pages. I noticed some discrepancies between this file and the inline styles (e.g., in .hero-section and body styles in index.html and comprehensive-demo.html).

uelkerd and others added 5 commits September 26, 2025 21:49
- Add shared styles.css with common components and variables
- Add demo.css for demo-specific styling
- Improve maintainability with external CSS files
- Address Copilot AI feedback on SVG data URI and documentation
- Remove inline CSS from index.html and demo.html
- Add external CSS links to styles.css and demo.css
- Reduce code duplication and improve maintainability
- Follows modular CSS architecture established
- Remove inline CSS from comprehensive-demo.html and integration.html
- Add external CSS links to styles.css
- Complete the CSS modularization refactor
- Improve code maintainability and reduce duplication
- Remove demo.html and integration.html (redundant standalone pages)
- Update index.html navigation: Home | Emotion Demo | Documentation
- Point all 'Emotion Demo' links to comprehensive-demo.html
- Remove 'All Features' and 'Team Integration' navigation items
- Update comprehensive-demo.html to remove integration references
- Remove Team Guides card that linked to integration

Navigation simplified from 5 items to 3 items for better UX.
Fortress compliance: 4 files changed (≤5 limit).

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.ai/code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add all missing component styles from original inline CSS
- Include demo-specific components (demo-container, demo-tab, result-card, etc.)
- Add comprehensive styling for metrics, loading states, and interactive elements
- Ensure full visual consistency with original design
- Address Copilot AI feedback on missing styles and design discrepancies
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
website/css/styles.css (1)

168-201: Consolidate duplicate component styles

feature-card, btn-primary, the @keyframes blocks, and even .footer are each defined twice in this stylesheet (first earlier in the file, then again here). Keeping one canonical definition per selector avoids accidental drift and makes future maintenance easier.

You can drop the earlier duplicate rules and keep this single, richer block, or merge the differences into one definition—for example:

-/* Initial feature-card definition (redundant) */
-.feature-card {
-  background: var(--glass-bg);
-  backdrop-filter: blur(15px);
-  border: 1px solid var(--glass-border);
-  border-radius: 20px;
-  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glass);
-  transition: var(--transition-bounce);
-  height: 100%;
-  color: inherit;
-  padding: 30px;
-  text-align: center;
-}
-
-/* ... later duplicate with updated properties ... */
-.feature-card {
-  background: var(--glass-bg);
-  backdrop-filter: blur(20px);
-  border: 1px solid var(--glass-border);
-  border-radius: 20px;
-  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glass);
-  transition: var(--transition-bounce);
-  height: 100%;
-  color: #e2e8f0;
-}
+/* Single canonical feature-card definition */
+.feature-card {
+  background: var(--glass-bg);
+  backdrop-filter: blur(20px);
+  border: 1px solid var(--glass-border);
+  border-radius: 20px;
+  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glass);
+  transition: var(--transition-bounce);
+  height: 100%;
+  color: #e2e8f0;
+  padding: 30px;
+  text-align: center;
+}

Apply the same cleanup to the other duplicated selectors so each lives in one place.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 062a13e and 6c62e96.

📒 Files selected for processing (5)
  • website/comprehensive-demo.html (1 hunks)
  • website/css/styles.css (1 hunks)
  • website/demo.html (0 hunks)
  • website/index.html (16 hunks)
  • website/integration.html (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • website/demo.html
  • website/integration.html
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Sourcery review
🔇 Additional comments (1)
website/comprehensive-demo.html (1)

19-20: External stylesheet hookup looks good

Great to see the page now pulling from the shared css/styles.css; this keeps the demo aligned with the rest of the site’s look and feel.

Comment thread website/css/styles.css Outdated
- Remove fixed sizing from .loading-spinner wrapper to prevent clipping
- Move spinner animation and styling to .spinner-border inner element
- Allow wrapper to size naturally while spinner maintains circular animation
- Addresses CodeRabbit AI feedback on loading spinner overflow issue
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
website/css/styles.css (3)

75-93: Deduplicate the .feature-card rules.

The selector is defined twice with overlapping but diverging property sets, which makes future tweaks error-prone. Let's collapse this into a single definition to avoid silent regressions.

-.feature-card {
-  background: var(--glass-bg);
-  backdrop-filter: blur(15px);
-  border: 1px solid var(--glass-border);
-  border-radius: 20px;
-  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glass);
-  transition: var(--transition-bounce);
-  height: 100%;
-  color: inherit;
-  padding: 30px;
-  text-align: center;
-}
-
-.feature-card:hover {
-  transform: translateY(-10px) scale(1.02);
-  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glow);
-}
-
-/* Feature cards */
-.feature-card {
-  background: var(--glass-bg);
-  backdrop-filter: blur(20px);
-  border: 1px solid var(--glass-border);
-  border-radius: 20px;
-  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glass);
-  transition: var(--transition-bounce);
-  height: 100%;
-  color: #e2e8f0;
-}
+.feature-card {
+  background: var(--glass-bg);
+  backdrop-filter: blur(20px);
+  border: 1px solid var(--glass-border);
+  border-radius: 20px;
+  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glass);
+  transition: var(--transition-bounce);
+  height: 100%;
+  color: #e2e8f0;
+  padding: 30px;
+  text-align: center;
+}

Also applies to: 157-191


60-73: Consolidate .btn-primary into a single rule.

We define the same selector twice with identical declarations. Keeping one authoritative block avoids drift if we tweak the style later.

-.btn-primary {
-  background: var(--primary-gradient);
-  border: none;
-  border-radius: 12px;
-  padding: 12px 30px;
-  font-weight: 600;
-  transition: var(--transition-bounce);
-  box-shadow: var(--shadow-glow);
-}
-
-.btn-primary:hover {
-  transform: translateY(-2px) scale(1.05);
-  box-shadow: 0 15px 50px rgba(139, 92, 246, 0.4);
-}
-
 /* Buttons */
 .btn-primary {
   background: var(--primary-gradient);
   border: none;
   border-radius: 12px;
   padding: 12px 30px;
   font-weight: 600;
   transition: var(--transition-bounce);
   box-shadow: var(--shadow-glow);
 }

Also applies to: 257-270


350-401: Remove duplicate @keyframes definitions.

@keyframes float and @keyframes fadeInUp are declared twice with the same content. Keeping a single declaration for each animation tightens the file and prevents conflicting edits later on.

-/* Animations */
-@keyframes float {
-  0%, 100% { transform: translateY(0px) rotate(0deg); }
-  33% { transform: translateY(-20px) rotate(1deg); }
-  66% { transform: translateY(-10px) rotate(-1deg); }
-}
-
-@keyframes fadeInUp {
-  from {
-    opacity: 0;
-    transform: translateY(40px) scale(0.95);
-  }
-  to {
-    opacity: 1;
-    transform: translateY(0) scale(1);
-  }
-}
-
 /* Demo section */
 .demo-section {
   background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6c62e96 and 134f65a.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • website/css/styles.css (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Sourcery review

@uelkerd uelkerd merged commit 50eeca1 into main Sep 26, 2025
11 of 13 checks passed
@uelkerd uelkerd deleted the feat/demo-website-minimal branch September 26, 2025 20:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants