Open
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
Collaborator
|
I have added the ideal and unmitigated results to the saved CSV file. The ideal results include a degree, fold_multiplier, num_chunks, and time as 0 (technically in the time column it appears as 0.0). For the mitigated results, the degree, fold_multiplier, and num_chunks are 0 with the time column set to 1.0. The runs that result in an error due to the circuit being too large to obtain a determinate are also saved in the CSV file with an empty result. Also, I updated the number of shots to be 1000 even for the simulator, in order to match what will be done on hardware. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Running Layerwise Richardson Extrapolation (LRE) on hardware.
Next steps
A first pass at this doesn't show great results, but the parameters we are running with LRE were basically chosen at random. Picking these more specifically, or doing a parameter sweep is a good place to start (first on simulator, and then hardware).
I chose the square heisenberg and qft circuits to run because since there are plenty of different sizes (number of qubits) available through benchpress. It might be nice to use that fact to test the performance as the system size grows.
@bdg221