Skip to content

Update valitydev/java-workflow action to v4#65

Open
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/valitydev-java-workflow-4.x
Open

Update valitydev/java-workflow action to v4#65
renovate[bot] wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
renovate/valitydev-java-workflow-4.x

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Feb 12, 2026

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
valitydev/java-workflow action major v3v4

Release Notes

valitydev/java-workflow (valitydev/java-workflow)

v4

Compare Source


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from a team as a code owner February 12, 2026 15:33
jobs:
build:
uses: valitydev/java-workflow/.github/workflows/maven-service-build.yml@v3
uses: valitydev/java-workflow/.github/workflows/maven-service-build.yml@v4

Check warning

Code scanning / CodeQL

Workflow does not contain permissions Medium

Actions job or workflow does not limit the permissions of the GITHUB_TOKEN. Consider setting an explicit permissions block, using the following as a minimal starting point: {}

Copilot Autofix

AI 27 days ago

In general, the fix is to explicitly specify the minimal required GITHUB_TOKEN permissions using a permissions: block, either at the workflow root (applies to all jobs) or at the job level (overrides root for that job). Since this workflow has only a single job, adding permissions at the root is simple and clearly documents the intent. The minimal safe starting point GitHub recommends is contents: read, which is sufficient for most CI build jobs that only need to read source code and metadata.

The best fix here without changing existing functionality is to add a root-level permissions: block just below the name: or on: section, with conservative read-only permissions. Given that this is a Maven build job using a reusable workflow, it very likely only needs to read repository contents; unless we know it needs more, we should set contents: read. This does not interfere with the uses: reference to the reusable workflow and preserves existing behavior while ensuring the GITHUB_TOKEN is not over-privileged by default. Concretely, in .github/workflows/build.yml, insert:

permissions:
  contents: read

near the top of the file (e.g., after name: and before on:). No imports or extra definitions are needed for YAML workflows.

Suggested changeset 1
.github/workflows/build.yml

Autofix patch

Autofix patch
Run the following command in your local git repository to apply this patch
cat << 'EOF' | git apply
diff --git a/.github/workflows/build.yml b/.github/workflows/build.yml
--- a/.github/workflows/build.yml
+++ b/.github/workflows/build.yml
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
 name: Maven Build Artifact
 
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+
 on:
   pull_request:
     branches:
EOF
@@ -1,5 +1,8 @@
name: Maven Build Artifact

permissions:
contents: read

on:
pull_request:
branches:
Copilot is powered by AI and may make mistakes. Always verify output.
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/valitydev-java-workflow-4.x branch from 4e24e4f to f63b7ae Compare February 25, 2026 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants