Skip to content

feat: 801 dutch datepicker - #853

Open
jarred-ritense wants to merge 3 commits into
next-minorfrom
feature/801-dutch-datepicker
Open

feat: 801 dutch datepicker#853
jarred-ritense wants to merge 3 commits into
next-minorfrom
feature/801-dutch-datepicker

Conversation

@jarred-ritense

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Describe the changes

Link to the related Github issue: generiekzaakafhandelcomponent/gzac-issues#801

Specify the code branch location:

Relevant comments:

Breaking changes

  • The contribution only contains changes that are not breaking.

Documentation

  • Release notes have been written for these changes.

New features or changes that have been introduced have been documented.

  • Yes
  • Not applicable

Tests

Unit tests have been added that cover these changes

  • Yes
  • Not applicable

Integration tests have been added that cover these changes

  • Yes
  • Not applicable

Describe the testing steps

  • Step 1
  • Step 2
  • Step 3

Security

The Secure by Design principle has been applied to these changes

  • Yes
  • Not applicable

Added or changed REST API endpoints have authentication and authorization in place

  • Yes
  • Not applicable

Valtimo access control checks have been implemented

  • Yes
  • Not applicable

Dependencies

Newly added dependencies do not introduce known vulnerabilities/CVE's and are in line with the Valtimo license

  • Yes
  • Not applicable

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@jarred-ritense, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 59 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 1da66883-b071-4f3c-a736-28eaddd202e3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 675b51b and 21319b7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • frontend/projects/valtimo/components/src/lib/components/form-io/form-io.module.ts
  • frontend/projects/valtimo/components/src/lib/components/form-io/formio-flatpickr.ts
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch feature/801-dutch-datepicker

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@jarred-ritense
jarred-ritense marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2026 08:31
@jarred-ritense
jarred-ritense requested a review from a team as a code owner July 28, 2026 08:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant