Skip to content

Feat/week2 phase3 segmented stability gates#1

Merged
vimscientist69 merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
feat/week2-phase3-segmented-stability-gates
Apr 22, 2026
Merged

Feat/week2 phase3 segmented stability gates#1
vimscientist69 merged 13 commits into
mainfrom
feat/week2-phase3-segmented-stability-gates

Conversation

@vimscientist69
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

…h new implementation playbook

- Deleted the Next Phase Execution Plan document as it is no longer relevant.
- Added a reference to the consolidated Week 2 implementation playbook in README.md, which includes an explanation, code map, and ordered tasks for the upcoming feature branch.
…rge functionality

- Added new scoring rules and flags to the default configuration, including minimum confidence and outlier thresholds.
- Introduced an advanced scoring section with configurable parameters for comps and ROI.
- Implemented a deep merge function to combine default and user-defined configurations, ensuring flexibility in scoring setups.
- Updated tests to verify loading and merging of scoring configurations from YAML files.
… logic

- Added advanced scoring configuration options, including weights for various scoring factors.
- Introduced new functions for normalizing location data, building comparison indices, and resolving comp contexts.
- Updated scoring job logic to utilize advanced features based on configuration flags.
- Enhanced unit tests to validate the new scoring logic and ensure correct behavior of advanced features.
…coring logic

- Added an explanation field to ScoreResult model to provide detailed scoring insights.
- Implemented a new function to build an explanation payload, summarizing scoring factors and confidence levels.
- Updated scoring job logic to include explanation generation based on advanced scoring configurations.
- Enhanced unit tests to validate the presence and accuracy of explanation data in scoring results.
- Improved the explanation payload structure in ScoreResult to provide clearer insights into scoring factors.
- Updated scoring job logic to better integrate advanced scoring configurations for explanation generation.
- Enhanced unit tests to ensure accuracy and completeness of explanation data in scoring results.
…mented.

implement scoring evaluation framework and enhance scoring configuration

- Added a new scoring evaluation command in the CLI to assess scoring results against defined thresholds and generate evaluation reports.
- Introduced a scoring evaluation service to compute metrics for data quality, scoring sanity, and stability, with configurable thresholds.
- Updated scoring configuration to include detailed evaluation thresholds for data quality and stability checks.
- Enhanced tests to validate the new scoring evaluation logic and ensure correct behavior of evaluation metrics.
- Expanded documentation to outline the new evaluation framework and its integration into the scoring process.
- Added comprehensive docstrings to various scoring evaluation functions to clarify their purpose, methodology, and significance.
- Improved the understanding of key metrics such as Jaccard similarity, Spearman rank correlation, and dominance ratio through detailed explanations.
- Ensured that the scoring evaluation process is well-documented, aiding future development and maintenance efforts.
- Refactored the computation of perturbation overlap to dynamically extract signal names from all rows instead of relying on a single seed vector.
- Improved the handling of signal names by utilizing a set for uniqueness and sorting them before processing, enhancing the clarity and efficiency of the evaluation logic.
- Enhanced the scoring evaluation logic to include detailed data quality failure reasons, improving transparency in evaluation outcomes.
- Updated the output file naming convention to include a readable timestamp for better traceability of evaluation reports.
- Added unfinished prompts in PROJECT_NOTE.md for phase 3, outlining considerations for scoring evaluation and data inspection.
…d update project notes

- Added structured violation details in the scoring evaluation output, including out-of-range rows, impossible top-ranked rows, and dominance violations for improved diagnostics.
- Updated the project notes to reflect the completion of initial dataset creation for testing purposes.
- Revised unfinished prompts in PROJECT_NOTE.md to clarify evaluation scope, emphasizing the need to assess not only top-ranked but also mid and bottom-ranked rows.
- Added a note to obtain a progress report on phase 3, ensuring better tracking of development milestones.
…tics

- Revised the scoring evaluation specification to define segment-based stability diagnostics for `top_band`, `middle_band`, and `bottom_band`, with `top_band` remaining the release-critical gate.
- Clarified the evaluation artifact requirements to include segment diagnostics and updated the acceptance criteria accordingly.
- Enhanced test cases to assert the presence of segment blocks and thresholds in the evaluation output.
…pdated thresholds

- Introduced rank displacement metrics to quantify movement magnitude in addition to membership/order agreement for `middle_band` and `bottom_band`.
- Updated percentile ranges for `middle_band` and `bottom_band` to improve diagnostic accuracy.
- Added new metrics for global rank shifts and refined the reporting schema to include displacement metrics.
- Adjusted warning thresholds for displacement metrics to ensure appropriate sensitivity in evaluations.
- Enhanced tests to validate the presence and functionality of new displacement metrics in the scoring evaluation output.
@vimscientist69 vimscientist69 merged commit 9437c44 into main Apr 22, 2026
1 of 2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant