add alignment on JPEG [i16; 64] blocks

[mcroomp]

Ensure that we access coefficient blocks 32 byte aligned so that we can autovectorize and optimize some codepaths via SIMD

[vstroebel]

Just some random thoughts, but wouldn't it be better to expose the 8x8 nature of the blocks to the compiler by introducing a Block structure that is backed by an [8; [i16;8]]?
In addition it might be possible to make the exact datatype of a "row" an implementation detail. This could make it possible to switch from a [i16;8] to a i16x8 if wide or std:simd is enabled.
I'm not sure sure whether this really works, but maybe this helps to unify some code of different fdct implementations.

[Shnatsel]

i16x8 should be a zero-cost conversion as long as the data is guaranteed to be aligned in memory, so I don't think it will be of any benefit compared to AlignedBlock.

We can even keep using unaligned loads for safety and the compiler will automatically transform them into aligned ones where possible.

[mcroomp]

The best row size depends on how wide the SIMD registers are, so it probably is better not to hardcode. The main advantage of this change is that even if you transmute to a SIMD in-place, the compile knows that it's properly aligned.

If you use the bytemuck crate you can cast directly from [i16;64] to the appropriate SIMD type safely (it statically asserts on the alignment).

[mcroomp]

Also there's some changes in here that came from cargo fmt, maybe as part of the checkin test you can add

cargo fmt --check

to the github action so that changes are always checked for formatting before checkin

[mcroomp]

I checked the generated code and it's true the compiler changes the loads to aligned with this change.

[vstroebel]

Also there's some changes in here that came from cargo fmt, maybe as part of the checkin test you can add

cargo fmt --check

to the github action so that changes are always checked for formatting before checkin

I've add the check and did a cargo fmt in #30.

Otherwise, this PR looks good. There are a few merge conflicts that need to be resolved before it can be merged.

[mcroomp]

I've fixed the merge issues and cleaned up any unnecessary changes. It needs workflow approval though to run the tests. Thanks!