Add did:definitiveid method

[davidgbvargroup]

DID Method Registration

As a DID method registrant, I have ensured that my DID method registration complies with the following statements:

• The DID Method specification defines the DID Method Syntax.
• The DID Method specification defines the Create, Read, Update, and Deactivate DID Method Operations.
• The DID Method specification contains a Security Considerations section.
• The DID Method specification contains a Privacy Considerations section.
• The JSON file I am submitting has passed all automated validation tests below.
• The JSON file contains a contactEmail address [OPTIONAL].
• The JSON file contains a verifiableDataRegistry entry [OPTIONAL].

[github-actions]

🤖 AI Preliminary Specification Review

This is an advisory, automated review of the DID Method specification(s) referenced in this pull request, checked against the registration checklist. It does not replace review by the registry editors.

✅ All reviewed submissions passed the preliminary checklist review. A registry editor will still perform the final review.

methods/definitiveid.json — method did:definitiveid

Specification: https://github.com/davidgbvargroup/did-definitiveid-method-spec/blob/main/spec.md

Preliminary verdict: ✅ PASS

The did:definitiveid specification is a genuine DID Method spec with defined syntax, operations, and substantive security and privacy sections. All MUST criteria pass; minor advisory warnings noted.

	Item	Level	Status	Notes
✅	M1. Specification is reachable and is a DID Method specification	MUST	pass
✅	M2. DID Method Syntax is defined	MUST	pass
✅	M3. CRUD operations are defined	MUST	pass
✅	M4. Security Considerations section is present and substantive	MUST	pass
✅	M5. Privacy Considerations section is present and substantive	MUST	pass
✅	M6. Method name is indicative and non-generic	MUST	pass
✅	M7. No unreasonable legal, security, moral, or privacy harms	MUST	pass
✅	M8. Human-readable description of the addition	MUST	pass
✅	S1. contactEmail present	OPTIONAL	pass
✅	S2. verifiableDataRegistry present	OPTIONAL	pass
⚠️	S3. Intellectual-property posture is clear	SHOULD	warn	The spec has a License section in its TOC but the license text was beyond the truncated portion, so the IP posture could not be fully confirmed. This is advisory only.

[ottomorac]

The entry meets the minimum requirements.