Extend roadmap: sandbox mode#422
Conversation
|
|
||
| ### Incognito mode | ||
|
|
||
| This scenario creates a session with browser in incognito mode. In spec terms, this involves: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note that "incognito mode" is a Chromism, and the equivalent feature may work slightly differently in different browsers. We need to be clear about which guarantees we are actually intending to offer here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Renamed to "sandbox" mode to avoid vendor-specific naming.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think that Sandbox mode is good either given that this conflicts with the Sandbox definition of the script module.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm open for any other name )
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"Isolated" mode?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
How about "Extend roadmap: Incognito/Private mode"
(as per https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/private-browsing-use-firefox-without-history, and Safari also uses the "Private" terminology)
sadym-chromium
changed the title
sadym-chromium
force-pushed
the
sadym/roadmap_incognito
branch
from
8cc9211 to
5872413
Compare
sadym-chromium
changed the title
The main observable difference between Chromium, Firefox and Safari is in cookies. Specifically in blocking/allowing third-party cookies. We can vaguely describe it as "other vendor-specific cookies limitations like can be applied". |
4 participants
#403 #289