Skip to content

instruction correction to no-longer-existing Scorers tab DOCS-1912#2196

Open
anastasiaguspan wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-annotation-scorer-DOCS-1912
Open

instruction correction to no-longer-existing Scorers tab DOCS-1912#2196
anastasiaguspan wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-annotation-scorer-DOCS-1912

Conversation

@anastasiaguspan
Copy link
Contributor

@anastasiaguspan anastasiaguspan commented Feb 25, 2026

Description

The main fix requested here was to fix blatantly bad instructions (there is no Scores in the project sidebar anymore). This primary change is a procedure at line 250/247
Whilst there, i did a pass through the page for cleanup and naming standarization.

Note: although the screenshots are still 'mostly' correct, they do show the out of date project sidebar and should be updated. I didn't update them at this time though because this human annotation is a different/old way to do the new annotation queue/annotation field stuff - so i'm not sure if this content has any life left once annotation queues goes GA. also, they need to rename some stuff to consistency (they're called 'scorers' here when they're called 'fields' in the new stuff, i let them know they should make these consistent). we can take new screenshots when all that gets sorted out.

(plus a random fix on another page for "Call details panel" instead of calling it a page (on the Traces page).

Testing

  • [ x] Local build succeeds without errors (mint dev)
  • [ x] Local link check succeeds without errors (mint broken-links)
  • PR tests succeed

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 25, 2026

📚 Mintlify Preview Links

🔗 View Full Preview

📝 Changed (2 total)

📄 Pages (2)

File Preview
weave/guides/evaluation/scorers.mdx Scorers
weave/guides/tracking/feedback.mdx Feedback

🤖 Generated automatically when Mintlify deployment succeeds
📍 Deployment: a21a4e3 at 2026-02-25 22:21:49 UTC

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Feb 25, 2026

🔗 Link Checker Results

All links are valid!

No broken links were detected.

Checked against: https://wb-21fd5541-fix-annotation-scorer-docs-1912.mintlify.app

Copy link
Contributor

@dbrian57 dbrian57 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor suggestions inline. Looks good, though!

## Provide feedback through the SDK

> You can find SDK usage examples for feedback in the UI under the **Use** tab in the call details page.
> You can find SDK usage examples for feedback in the UI under the **Use** tab in the Call details panel.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
> You can find SDK usage examples for feedback in the UI under the **Use** tab in the Call details panel.
You can find SDK usage examples for feedback in the UI under the **Use** tab in the Call details panel.

pretty sure we don't need to indent this.

> You can find SDK usage examples for feedback in the UI under the **Use** tab in the call details page.
> You can find SDK usage examples for feedback in the UI under the **Use** tab in the Call details panel.

You can use the Weave SDK to programmatically add, remove, and query feedback on calls.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
You can use the Weave SDK to programmatically add, remove, and query feedback on calls.
You can use the Weave Python SDK to programmatically [add](/weave/reference/python-sdk/trace/feedback#method-add), [remove](/weave/reference/python-sdk/trace/feedback#method-purge), and [query feedback](/weave/reference/python-sdk/trace/weave_client#method-get_feedback) on calls. The TypeScript SDK does not currently support feedback functionality.

I know this was outside the scope of this PR, but this definitely needed some links 😅

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants