Add interactive architecture diagrams#1
Conversation
- Generate 4 diagram types (architecture, components, dataflow, hybrid) - Embed in docs/architecture.html with tooltips and modals - Link from README
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 59 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 45b901573c
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".
| </style> | ||
| </head> | ||
| <body> | ||
| <a class="back" href="../../README.md">← Back to README</a> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When this page is opened from docs/architecture.html, ../../README.md resolves two directories up, outside the repository path (or to the site root on GitHub Pages), so the “Back to README” link lands on a missing file instead of the project README. Since the README now directs users to this page, the backlink should only go up one level, e.g. ../README.md.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Adds docs/architecture.html with four interactive diagrams (architecture, components, dataflow, hybrid) plus tooltips and modals. Generated by portfolio upgrade automation.