Creation of LICENSE file to add a license#473
Conversation
By default, any creative work without an explicit license, including Github repositories like yours, have the most restrictive license of them all: exclusive "all rights reserved" copyright. I assume that since you have your (awesome) software in a Github repository, it is your intent for people to use it, fork it and improve it. Thus, I'd strongly advise to add an open source license to facilitate this -- otherwise, it would be illegal to use this code in any way. If you want to allow any use of it, I'd recommend a MIT License (which is the one I'm including in this pull-request). I am happy to help clarify doubts or uncertainties around all this, or help choose another license if you don't like these (there are other options in Github's https://choosealicense.com).
|
Btw, congrats on your work, I'm a Patreon supporter :) |
|
Thank you for the support! I'd be happy to introduce a license and make this some level of OSS, but I'm uncertain the correct license to use, which is why I haven't too date. Ideally, I'm looking for a license that lets people fork and use the code in apps as they see fit, provided they do not use it to produce a direct clone of the app and submit it to the app stores. But my naive understanding of OSS is that I can't strictly prevent this? Also because the repository contains some 'content' that is not authored by me directly (Campaign information, icons, etc), I wanted to make sure whatever license I picked had some accounting for that. Do you know if there is a license that would suit these requirements? |
|
Given your preferences, I would recommend the following:
Hope this helps |
By default, any creative work without an explicit license, including Github repositories like yours, have the most restrictive license of them all: exclusive "all rights reserved" copyright. I assume that since you have your (awesome) software in a Github repository, it is your intent for people to use it, fork it and improve it. Thus, I'd strongly advise to add an open source license to facilitate this -- otherwise, it would be illegal to use this code in any way. If you want to allow any use of it, I'd recommend a MIT License (which is the one I'm including in this pull-request). I am happy to help clarify doubts or uncertainties around all this, or help choose another license if you don't like these (there are other options in Github's https://choosealicense.com).