IS-05: Testing scenario when two receivers get bulk-staged for relati…

[bakaleks]

…ve scheduled activation. Both of them should be activated. Testing with Sony's nmos-cpp-node sample application with two registered receivers

[bakaleks]

Testing with following change sony/nmos-cpp#43

[garethsb]

Thanks, @bakaleks. I think this will be a great addition to the test suite - it demonstrated a bug in my implementation as you said.

I'd like to see a bit of refactoring to eliminate the duplication with IS05Utils.check_perform_relative_activation if possible. What do you think, @andrewbonney?

[andrewbonney]

I'll ask @simonrankine to take a quick scan. Otherwise as this is your first contribution @bakaleks we'll probably have to ask you to fill in an IPR form as-per point 3 in https://github.com/AMWA-TV/nmos-testing/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.pdf. It might be easiest for us to discuss in person next week.

[simonrankine]

Over-all this looks like a good and useful thing to have in the test suite, thanks very much for your contribution. What I would say is that there seems to be a lot with duplication with check_bulk_stage in the same file, to the point where I think I'd like it to be combined with check_bulk_active_relative before we merge, or this code is going to get mighty hard to maintain.