Skip to content

Force mode arguments - #707

Closed
URJala wants to merge 5 commits into
UniversalRobots:masterfrom
URJala:force_mode_arguments
Closed

Force mode arguments#707
URJala wants to merge 5 commits into
UniversalRobots:masterfrom
URJala:force_mode_arguments

Conversation

@URJala

@URJala URJala commented Jul 9, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

add damping and gain scale arguments to ROS service call. These can be set with each force mode call when PR is implemented.
This is also dependent on PR for the service definition.

@URJala
URJala force-pushed the force_mode_arguments branch from b7b6de3 to a87eb27 Compare January 8, 2025 14:38
@urfeex
urfeex force-pushed the force_mode_arguments branch from a87eb27 to 4f14e98 Compare February 24, 2025 14:47
@urfeex
urfeex force-pushed the force_mode_arguments branch from 4f14e98 to e6d3123 Compare March 10, 2025 11:19

@urfeex urfeex left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This implementation has the same issues as #718: When this is used while the JTC is active, the robot will try to get back to the latest commanded configuration once force mode is disabled. We cannot merge it like this.

@urfeex urfeex added the wontfix This will not be worked on label Mar 24, 2025
@urfeex

urfeex commented Mar 24, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

This will probably not get merged unless somebody picks up the work of moving this to a separate controller so that resource management can be done properly.

This feature exists in the ROS 2 driver, we recommend to switching to that by now.

I'll leave this PR open, as the feature as such is working and usable if precautions are taken (stop JTC before using this feature).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

wontfix This will not be worked on

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants