Skip to content

chore: Rename some servers to current, add transition server definitions#20

Merged
lucasmcdonald3 merged 7 commits into
fireegg-test-serversfrom
transition-renames
Sep 29, 2025
Merged

chore: Rename some servers to current, add transition server definitions#20
lucasmcdonald3 merged 7 commits into
fireegg-test-serversfrom
transition-renames

Conversation

@lucasmcdonald3

@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 commented Sep 25, 2025

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

Shuffle around names for current and transition servers.

I also wanted to rename existing server folders to "current" (ex. java-v3-server -> java-v3-current-server) but git really, really did not like that with submodules, etc. especially with Ruby.
Let's just name the new folders as "transition", ex. java-v3-transition-server.

Also, upload the test output file so we can see why any tests failed.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

Base automatically changed from renames to fireegg-test-servers September 26, 2025 16:19
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 changed the title chore: Rename existing servers to "current", add new implementation targets chore: Add new implementation targets Sep 26, 2025
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 changed the title chore: Add new implementation targets chore: Rename targets to current, add transition server definitions Sep 29, 2025
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 changed the title chore: Rename targets to current, add transition server definitions chore: Rename some servers to current, add transition server definitions Sep 29, 2025
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 merged commit af89d0f into fireegg-test-servers Sep 29, 2025
2 checks passed
@lucasmcdonald3 lucasmcdonald3 deleted the transition-renames branch September 29, 2025 17:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants