Skip to content

qa(scores): record v1.0.4-rc2 ledger row (post-Sprint-1 re-measure @c92a393) - #747

Merged
100yenadmin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
data/rc2-ledger-row
Jun 10, 2026
Merged

qa(scores): record v1.0.4-rc2 ledger row (post-Sprint-1 re-measure @c92a393)#747
100yenadmin merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
data/rc2-ledger-row

Conversation

@100yenadmin

@100yenadmin 100yenadmin commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Data-only: the rc2 ruler-stamped RRI row + rendered ledger. Product delta vs rc1: criticals 4→1, sat 4.8→5.8, 4/5 personas clean; RRI 2.7 depressed only by the skipped Mac handoff + the #745 stall (fixed in #746). Found during the post-Sprint-1 audit — the row was local-only.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Updated quality assurance scores and metrics for the latest release candidate version.

… re-measure)

Clean 5-canonical rollup: RRI 2.7/10 — but the PRODUCT improved vs rc1: criticals 4->1
(the #735 keystone validated), sat 4.8->5.8, behavioral GREEN, 4/5 personas clean. The
RRI drop is two NON-product effects: -1 native_gate (Mac handoff skipped, disk) and
-1 no_give_up (newbie mid-stream stall = #745, fix merged in #746 post-sweep). Same
ruler sc_5ac7a1d9103c as rc1 (apples-to-apples). Ledger row v1.0.4-rc2-c92a393.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7cec583c-e30a-4547-b924-7a3e867d7afd

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between dca46bd and 16edfda.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • qa/scores.db is excluded by !**/*.db
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • qa/scores_ledger.md

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The scores ledger is regenerated with one additional scored run. The ledger metadata increments the row count to 66 and refreshes the rendered timestamp. A new top entry for v1.0.4-rc2-c92a393 is added to the scores table with updated Story/Mech/AngryDM/Behav/Sat/RRI metrics, pass/fail outcome, and expanded notes describing release-candidate context and gating gaps.

Changes

Scores Ledger Update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Ledger entry and metadata refresh
qa/scores_ledger.md
The ledger table preface (row count and rendered timestamp) is updated to reflect 66 rows, and a new top entry for v1.0.4-rc2-c92a393 (GUI-built-app, opus/opus) is added with Story/Mech/AngryDM/Behav/Sat/RRI metrics, pass/fail outcome, and detailed notes on release-candidate context and specific gating/harness gaps.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • electricsheephq/WorldOS#724: Both PRs update qa/scores_ledger.md by regenerating it from qa/scores.db to append a single additional scored-run row and refresh the ledger header (rows count and rendered timestamp).
  • electricsheephq/WorldOS#728: The main PR only regenerates qa/scores_ledger.md by adding another top scored run entry, consistent with outputs produced by the RRI rollup fix.

Poem

📊 A ledger grows with each new test,
Sixty-six rows, all at their best,
Timestamps dance, metrics shine bright,
One more release in my sight! 🐰✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description check ⚠️ Warning The description is missing required sections from the template (Summary with why context, and Validation section). Only the data facts are provided without structured sections or CLA verification. Add a Summary section explaining the purpose of the ledger update, and complete the Licensing/CLA and Validation sections with required checkboxes and test confirmation.
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding a v1.0.4-rc2 ledger row with the commit hash and context of a post-Sprint-1 re-measure.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant