Conversation
10891f7 to
f6b4891
Compare
AhmadAmine998
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a great starting point
|
Thanks a lot! I'll try to look into it as soon as possible :-) Note: Added some notes, next version during tomorrow/Friday. |
|
Hello! Sorry for being delayed so much, but I had to work on other, unexpected, assignments. I tried to push the whole draft close to the final version, therefore, the amount of TODOs is very limited. I also tried to be much more strict with words Felix suggested (MUST, MUST NOT, etc.) but it is still not used everywhere. |
|
Nice, I'll look into it (hopefully) tomorrow. Note that for some reason you were commenting on an older version. Newest one is currently d24d04b |
|
@jara001 can you please resolve threads that have been addressed in the latest commit? |
|
Minor suggestion: We should change the pr to be into #1 dev-2026, then merge dev-2026 into main. This would just help keep a standard dev-20xx for branches (and helps us check history in the future). |
Nice suggestion! Should I overwrite your changes there or merge it? I've added offenses/violations, and included some other minor feedback. Lately it seems that most of the requested/suggested changes are just minor ones... does it mean that we are FINALLY getting close to the final version? :) |
AhmadAmine998
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All seems good now. I did one final pass of wording adjustments for consistency and clarity, but all content is great. Will merge into dev-2026 to finalize the merge into main there.
AhmadAmine998
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All seems good now. I did one final pass of wording adjustments for consistency and clarity, but all content is great. Will merge into dev-2026 to finalize the merge into main there.
|
Merging this into dev-2026 to move towards final commit and release. Only two issues left to address imo:
|
Here is the latest draft of the new ruleset. It did not go through corrections, but I managed to do another two iterations since our last call (e.g., I added the stuff we discussed). Some notes are still present.
Main points:
Feel free to discuss and comment even on small parts of the draft.
I think it starts to get a certain shape, but some parts are still missing (and, therefore, might be eventually removed) and some parts are not detailed enough.
Just to note, I am still thinking about making a version (or maybe just add comments invisible to the teams) suited more for the organizers.
Note 2: I plan to add a diff with the current rules as well.
Note 3: I force-pushed the branch so it does not mess up in GitHub. Diff with current rules will be in README.md.