feat: added jobservice queue subcommand

[NishchayRajput]

Description

Briefly describe what this pull request does and why the change is needed.

This PR adds queue management commands under harbor jobservice queues to improve Job Service Dashboard parity for CLI users.
It enables listing queue state and executing queue lifecycle actions (stop/pause/resume) using either interactive or non-interactive flows.

• Fixes: [feature]: Implementing Jobservice Dashboard in CLI #774

Type of Change

Please select the relevant type.

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Refactor
• Documentation update
• Chore / maintenance

Changes

• Added queue command group support: list, stop, pause, resume.
• Added queue API handlers and queue table rendering support.
• Added queue command docs (CLI docs + man pages) and queue helper unit tests.

Command and Flag Behavior

Commands added

• harbor jobservice queues list
• harbor jobservice queues stop
• harbor jobservice queues pause
• harbor jobservice queues resume

Supported flags by command

• harbor jobservice queues list

  • no queue-specific flags
  • supports global --output-format json|yaml

• harbor jobservice queues stop

  • --type <type|all> (repeatable and comma-separated)
  • --interactive / -i

• harbor jobservice queues pause

  • --type <type|all> (repeatable and comma-separated)
  • --interactive / -i

• harbor jobservice queues resume

  • --type <type|all> (repeatable and comma-separated)
  • --interactive / -i

Default interactive behavior

• Interactive UI is the default for stop, pause, and resume when --type is not provided.
• Non-interactive mode is used automatically when one or more --type values are provided.

Interactive selection behavior

• resume: only paused queues are shown.
• pause: only unpaused queues are shown.
• stop: all available queues are shown.

Type normalization behavior

• Supports repeated flags: --type A --type B
• Supports comma-separated values: --type A,B
• Deduplicates queue types
• all short-circuits to global action semantics

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 1.14504% with 259 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 9.13%. Comparing base (60ad0bd) to head (c6e9cb3).
⚠️ Report is 163 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/queues/utils.go	0.00%	101 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/queues/pause.go	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/queues/resume.go	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/queues/stop.go	0.00%	23 Missing ⚠️
pkg/utils/jobservice/errors.go	0.00%	22 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/queues/list.go	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
pkg/api/jobservice_handler.go	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/cmd.go	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
pkg/views/jobservice/queues/view.go	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/queues/cmd.go	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #793      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   10.99%   9.13%   -1.86%     
=========================================
  Files         173     300     +127     
  Lines        8671   14859    +6188     
=========================================
+ Hits          953    1357     +404     
- Misses       7612   13376    +5764     
- Partials      106     126      +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[qcserestipy]

In principle LGTM, the commands however should be only accessible for admins. Please make sure that a user needs elevated priviledges.
also lint fails, please fix

[NishchayRajput]

In principle LGTM, the commands however should be only accessible for admins. Please make sure that a user needs elevated priviledges. also lint fails, please fix

[qcserestipy]

LGTM

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

[bupd]

/lgtm