feat: added jobservice schedule subcommand

[NishchayRajput]

Description

Briefly describe what this pull request does and why the change is needed.

This PR adds schedule management commands under harbor jobservice schedules to improve Job Service Dashboard parity for CLI users.
It enables listing schedules, checking global scheduler status, and pausing or resuming all schedules from the CLI.

• Fixes [feature]: Implementing Jobservice Dashboard in CLI #774

Type of Change

Please select the relevant type.

• Bug fix
• New feature
• Documentation update
• Refactor
• Chore / maintenance

Changes

• Added schedule command group support: list, status, pause-all, resume-all.
• Added schedule API handlers and schedule table/status rendering support.
• Added schedule command docs (CLI docs + man pages) and schedule helper unit tests.

Command and Flag Behavior

Commands added

• harbor jobservice schedules list
• harbor jobservice schedules status
• harbor jobservice schedules pause-all
• harbor jobservice schedules resume-all

Supported flags by command

• harbor jobservice schedules list

  • --page
  • --page-size
  • supports global --output-format json|yaml

• harbor jobservice schedules status

  • no schedule-specific flags
  • supports global --output-format json|yaml

• harbor jobservice schedules pause-all

  • no schedule-specific flags

• harbor jobservice schedules resume-all

  • no schedule-specific flags

Default behavior

• list uses page 1 and page-size 20 when flags are omitted.
• status reports the global scheduler state for job_type=all.
• pause-all and resume-all operate directly on the global scheduler and are non-interactive.

[NucleoFusion]

Can you convert this to a draft, since this would cause conflicts with the other PR #793
And we can wait till the other gets merged

[qcserestipy]

Thank you for your contribution! LGTM, pls fix linting and wait for other PRs to be merged before.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 11.42857% with 155 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 9.04%. Comparing base (60ad0bd) to head (5c39263).
⚠️ Report is 159 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
pkg/api/jobservice_handler.go	0.00%	32 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/schedules/list.go	0.00%	29 Missing ⚠️
pkg/utils/jobservice/errors.go	0.00%	22 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/schedules/status.go	0.00%	19 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/schedules/pause_all.go	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/schedules/resume_all.go	0.00%	14 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/schedules/cmd.go	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
cmd/harbor/root/jobservice/cmd.go	0.00%	11 Missing ⚠️
pkg/views/jobservice/schedules/view.go	89.47%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             main    #795      +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage   10.99%   9.04%   -1.95%     
=========================================
  Files         173     281     +108     
  Lines        8671   13616    +4945     
=========================================
+ Hits          953    1231     +278     
- Misses       7612   12269    +4657     
- Partials      106     116      +10     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[qcserestipy]

Lint fails

[qcserestipy]

Please also check that the commands should be only accessible for admins. Please make sure that a user needs elevated priviledges.

[NishchayRajput]

Please also check that the commands should be only accessible for admins. Please make sure that a user needs elevated priviledges.

[qcserestipy]

Please update the docs such that the lint pipeline does not fail

[NishchayRajput]

Please update the docs such that the lint pipeline does not fail

done

[qcserestipy]

LGTM

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.