Skip to content

IBX-12173: Added Varnish 9 Docker build - #64

Open
vidarl wants to merge 3 commits into
ibexa:4.6from
vidarl:IBX-12173_support_for_varnish9
Open

IBX-12173: Added Varnish 9 Docker build#64
vidarl wants to merge 3 commits into
ibexa:4.6from
vidarl:IBX-12173_support_for_varnish9

Conversation

@vidarl

@vidarl vidarl commented Aug 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
🎫 Issue IBX-12173

Caution

This PR from is from my own fork as I didn't have write permmission to ibexa/docker at the time. However, ibexa/http-cache#84 needs this PR for it's CI to go green. I therefore had to add a dependencies.json to that PR. However, I cannot reference external repos in that file as that will cause GH rate limits. I therefore also pushed the branch for this docker PR to the ibexa repo too. Any changes to this PR needs to be pushed to that branch too. I don't expect any changes, that is why I didn't open it as a new PR

Related PRs:

Description:

Adds docker/Dockerfile-varnish9 and docker/varnish9.yml, Planning to remove varnish 7 in 6.0 branch as varnish7 is no longer maintained

For QA:

Use https://github.com/ibexa/docker/tree/IBX-12173_support_for_varnish9_50 when testing on 5.0

Documentation:

@vidarl
vidarl force-pushed the IBX-12173_support_for_varnish9 branch from 1916fb3 to 9beb9dc Compare August 5, 2026 13:25
@vidarl vidarl changed the title IBX-12173: Added Varnish 9 Docker build (opt-in) IBX-12173: Added Varnish 9 Docker build Aug 5, 2026
@vidarl
vidarl force-pushed the IBX-12173_support_for_varnish9 branch from 9beb9dc to 558e1d1 Compare August 5, 2026 13:29
@vidarl
vidarl requested a review from a team August 5, 2026 13:32
@konradoboza
konradoboza requested review from a team and micszo August 5, 2026 14:03
Comment thread docker/varnish9.yml Outdated
Comment thread docker/varnish9.yml Outdated
@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants