Skip to content

[codex] Fix async conversation restore decoding and add targeted unit tests#36

Draft
jskoiz wants to merge 1 commit into
agent/build-bootstrapfrom
codex/test-foundation
Draft

[codex] Fix async conversation restore decoding and add targeted unit tests#36
jskoiz wants to merge 1 commit into
agent/build-bootstrapfrom
codex/test-foundation

Conversation

@jskoiz

@jskoiz jskoiz commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What changed

  • fixes ISO-8601 date decoding in async conversation index and snapshot restore paths
  • adds a package-backed Yemma4Tests target plus focused regression tests for conversation restore and streaming rendering
  • includes the minimal PreferenceKey.defaultValue Swift 6 fix needed for this test branch to build standalone
  • documents the working package-workspace test flow

Why

Task 04 called for a real test foundation plus the restore bugfix. The restore path was decoding persisted timestamps inconsistently, and the repo needed a repeatable place to pin that behavior with tests.

Impact

Conversation history restore is more reliable, and there is now a focused branch-local test surface for persistence and rendering regressions.

Validation

  • ./scripts/bootstrap_mlx_swift_lm.sh
  • build-ios-apps simulator build succeeded for Yemma4 on Yemma Preview 17 Pro Max (iOS Simulator 26.4)
  • build-ios-apps package-workspace tests passed: 3/3

@vercel

vercel Bot commented Apr 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated (UTC)
yemma-4 Ready Ready Preview, Comment Jun 3, 2026 7:50pm

@jskoiz

jskoiz commented May 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

@codex review please run a code review on the latest PR head.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Delightful!

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

@jskoiz

jskoiz commented May 7, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner Author

Codex review pass: I did not find a blocking issue in this pass. Caveat: I did not run local tests; I reviewed the ISO-8601 restore fix and targeted tests, but PR checks only show GitGuardian/Vercel-style checks, not the documented xcodebuild test lane.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant