Skip to content

chore: sync from monorepo @9b81d97#38

Open
WomB0ComB0 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sync/monorepo-9b81d97
Open

chore: sync from monorepo @9b81d97#38
WomB0ComB0 wants to merge 1 commit into
mainfrom
sync/monorepo-9b81d97

Conversation

@WomB0ComB0
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Automated sync from resq-software/resQ@9b81d97.

Review before merging — direct pushes to standalone repos are preserved.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai Bot commented May 2, 2026

Warning

Rate limit exceeded

@WomB0ComB0 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 51 minutes and 36 seconds before requesting another review.

To keep reviews running without waiting, you can enable usage-based add-on for your organization. This allows additional reviews beyond the hourly cap. Account admins can enable it under billing.

⌛ How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

🚦 How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.

Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.

Please see our FAQ for further information.

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: cb0c7409-0923-491b-8ccb-0a3eeac5e966

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b255bb4 and f8b3013.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • Directory.Packages.props
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch sync/monorepo-9b81d97

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
Review rate limit: 0/1 reviews remaining, refill in 51 minutes and 36 seconds.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@socket-security
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review the following changes in direct dependencies. Learn more about Socket for GitHub.

Diff Package Supply Chain
Security
Vulnerability Quality Maintenance License
Updatedmicrosoft.extensions.logging.abstractions@​10.0.6 ⏵ 10.0.7431009010070
Updatedmicrosoft.extensions.options@​10.0.6 ⏵ 10.0.7931009010070
Updatedmicrosoft.extensions.http@​10.0.6 ⏵ 10.0.7951009010070
Updatedmicrosoft.extensions.http.polly@​10.0.6 ⏵ 10.0.710010090100100

View full report

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request updates several Microsoft Extensions packages to version 10.0.7. Feedback indicates that the update to Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly may be inappropriate as it is a legacy integration for Polly v7, whereas the codebase utilizes Polly v8; migrating to Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Resilience is recommended. Additionally, the reviewer noted that these dependencies might be unused or should be properly leveraged through IHttpClientFactory rather than direct HttpClient instantiation.

Comment thread Directory.Packages.props
Comment on lines +21 to +22
<PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Http" Version="10.0.7" />
<PackageVersion Include="Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly" Version="10.0.7" />
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The update to Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly (v10.0.7) appears inconsistent with the codebase's adoption of Polly v8 resilience pipelines (as seen in BaseServiceClient.cs). Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Polly is the legacy integration for Polly v7 'Policies'. For Polly v8, the official integration is Microsoft.Extensions.Http.Resilience. Additionally, since the current client implementations instantiate HttpClient directly rather than using IHttpClientFactory, these dependencies might be unused or should be leveraged via the factory pattern for better resource management and DNS handling.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TODO: @WomB0ComB0

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant