[WIP] Enhance test quality in pkg/workflow/features_test.go#16156
Closed
[WIP] Enhance test quality in pkg/workflow/features_test.go#16156
Conversation
Co-authored-by: pelikhan <4175913+pelikhan@users.noreply.github.com>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Test Quality Improvement: pkg/workflow/features_test.go ✅
Successfully converted manual assertions to testify patterns for consistency with codebase standards.
Summary of Changes
Changes Made
1. Added testify imports:
2. Converted assertions from manual to testify:
if result != expected→assert.Equal(t, expected, result, msg)assert.True()/assert.False()3. Added validation checks:
require.NotNil()checks after WorkflowData construction to ensure setup succeeded4. Net Impact:
pkg/workflow/compiler_test.goand other test filesscratchpad/testing.mdTest Results
Acceptance Criteria Met ✅
github.com/stretchr/testify/assertandgithub.com/stretchr/testify/requireif result != expectedchecks toassert.Equal()assert.True()/assert.False()require.NotNil()checks after WorkflowData construction in complex testsgo test -v ./pkg/workflow/ -run TestIsFeatureEnabled✅go test -v ./pkg/workflow/ -run TestMergedFeatures✅Note: This is a code quality improvement that brings the test file in line with codebase standards. No functional changes were made to the source code (
features.go), only test assertions were modernized.Original prompt
This section details on the original issue you should resolve
<issue_title>[testify-expert] Improve Test Quality: pkg/workflow/features_test.go</issue_title>
<issue_description>### Overview
The test file
pkg/workflow/features_test.gohas been selected for quality improvement by the Testify Uber Super Expert. While this file demonstrates excellent use of table-driven tests, there are opportunities to enhance test quality by adopting testify assertion patterns used throughout the codebase.Current State
pkg/workflow/features_test.gopkg/workflow/features.goisFeatureEnabled()are testedTest Quality Analysis
Strengths ✅
t.Run()and descriptive test case namest.Setenv()- Proper isolation using Go 1.17+ environment variable helperAreas for Improvement 🎯
1. Replace Manual Assertions with Testify
Current Issue:
All assertions use manual
ifchecks witht.Errorf()instead of testify'sassertandrequirepackages that are the standard throughout this codebase.Specific Examples:
Recommended Changes:
Why this matters:
pkg/workflow/compiler_test.goand other test filesscratchpad/testing.md)2. Add Nil Check Assertions for WorkflowData Construction
Current Issue:
Tests construct
WorkflowDatabut don't validate the construction succeeded before using it.Recommended Changes:
Why this matters: Makes test failures clearer if the construction logic changes in the future.
Implementation Plan
Phase 1: Add Testify Imports (5 minutes)
Phase 2: Convert Assertions Function by Function (30 minutes)
Priority Order:
TestIsFeatureEnabled(lines 11-80) - 8 test cases, most straightforward conversionTestIsFeatureEnabledNoEnv(lines 82-87) - Simple boolean checkTestIsFeatureEnabledWithData(lines 89-178) - Most complex, needs careful message formattingTestIsFeatureEnabledWithDataNilWorkflow(lines 180-189) - Simple boolean checkTestMergedFeaturesAreUsedByIsFeatureEnabled(lines 193-245) - 5 test casesTestMergedFeaturesTopLevelPrecedence(lines 249-...💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.