Skip to content

fix(trace): recover Agent lifecycles (superseded by #131) - #151

Closed
rgao-coreweave wants to merge 10 commits into
109-10-recursive-dispatchfrom
109-10-agent-recovery
Closed

fix(trace): recover Agent lifecycles (superseded by #131)#151
rgao-coreweave wants to merge 10 commits into
109-10-recursive-dispatchfrom
109-10-agent-recovery

Conversation

@rgao-coreweave

@rgao-coreweave rgao-coreweave commented Jul 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Superseded

This recovery work is folded into #131 so reviewers can evaluate one complete Agent identity and ownership model.

No behavior was dropped: #131 keeps exact-ID matching, bounded owner-scoped transcript reconstruction, fail-closed ambiguity handling, nested/root separation, and duplicate-hook idempotence.

The active stack now continues directly from #131 to #148.

@rgao-coreweave
rgao-coreweave force-pushed the 109-10-recursive-dispatch branch from f293afc to 9d62471 Compare July 23, 2026 16:24
@rgao-coreweave
rgao-coreweave force-pushed the 109-10-agent-recovery branch from 068fbb0 to 74cb3f8 Compare July 23, 2026 16:24
@rgao-coreweave
rgao-coreweave force-pushed the 109-10-recursive-dispatch branch from 9d62471 to bf78874 Compare July 23, 2026 22:46
@rgao-coreweave rgao-coreweave changed the title fix(daemon): recover and harden Agent lifecycle correlation fix(trace): recover Agent lifecycles (superseded by #131) Jul 23, 2026
@rgao-coreweave

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Closing as superseded by #131. The recovery and correlation behavior now lands with the live Agent lifecycle so it can be reviewed as one complete ownership model. No behavior was dropped: #131 keeps exact-ID matching, bounded owner-scoped transcript reconstruction, fail-closed ambiguity handling, nested/root separation, and duplicate-hook idempotence. The stack now continues directly from #131 to #148.

@github-actions github-actions Bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 23, 2026
@wandb wandb unlocked this conversation Jul 23, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant